PHOEBE PALMER
It has been
said that “One cannot understand the Holiness Movement today without a
knowledge of Phoebe Palmer and the Tuesday Meetings.”[i] This statement shows the tremendous
influence that Mrs Palmer had. Her
ministry touched the lives of many, some of whom were to have a decisive impact
on Christian History, such as William Booth, the founder of the Salvation
Army. Mrs Palmer’s ministry started in
a humble manner in the Tuesday Meeting that she and her sister founded; these meetings were to spread to many parts
of America. Mrs Palmer and her husband
were involved in evangelistic campaigns and in camp meetings. The Palmers also spent time in Britain
influencing the founders of the Keswick Convention. In all of this Phoebe
Palmer’s main concern was to promote holy living.
Phoebe
Palmer used testimony as her major teaching tool and she therefore had a very
strong emphasis on the experiential nature of the Christian faith. This has caused some to see her as overly
subjective in her teaching. This is an
understandable reaction but it does not always do justice to Mrs Palmer’s
desire to be a Bible Christian. Her aim was to draw people into the fullness of
biblical faith and holiness of life.
With a background of Methodism,
her Wesleyan theology shows through at many points in her teaching; this is so
even when she develops her thinking in novel ways. Mrs Palmer was known for her Altar theology
and many attribute this to her. If this
is so, Finney took this terminology on board at a very early stage. The other
alternative is that this phraseology was already in use by the 1830’s and Mrs
Palmer developed it. She was active in
ministry for many years before she equated the reception of holiness with the
baptism of the Spirit. Timothy Smith
says,
Phoebe Palmer...was so involved in the elaboration of John
Wesley’s language of Calvary that she was one of the last to adopt the new
terminology, but she did adopt it, in the fall of 1856, after a summer of
immense spiritual refreshing in camp meetings in Western New York. Her next major book, Promise of the Father
for the Last Days, made Peter’s text at Pentecost the basis of faith for the
“second blessing” and the foundation as well of a biblical argument in favour
of women’s right to preach the gospel.[ii]
Smith here
refers to the Palmer’s, The Promise of the Father, but before returning to this
volume one needs to look at her earlier teaching and see how this prepares for
her later teaching on the baptism of the Spirit.
Phoebe
Palmer is perhaps remembered best for her book, The Way of Holiness. In this volume we are confronted with a woman who desires
to be a Bible Christian at any cost. She
struggles to find a way forward to a more holy life. This book was to influence the whole tone of
holiness teaching, by showing how to enter the blessing of entire
sanctification. Although Mrs Palmer did
not refer to the baptism of the Holy Spirit in her early ministry, she did
believe in a second work of grace subsequent to salvation.
Teaching
through testimony was Mrs Palmer’s strong point, she never claimed to have
presented a systematic theological approach to the subject. Phoebe Palmer wanted to use her biblical
knowledge to see lives transformed. Her
book, The Way of Holiness, was criticised in her own day because it was
claimed that she downplayed the inner
witness of the Holy Spirit and replaced it with syllogistic holiness. This was linked to her altar terminology
and her teaching about naked faith.
Although Mrs Palmer is probably not guilty at this point, it is very
easy to see how her followers would arrive at this position.
William
Greathouse makes this helpful comment,
Eventually the altar theology became one of the common ways
of preaching and teaching in the holiness movement. Mrs Palmer herself was able to satisfy most
of her critics that her teachings were “substantially orthodox and Wesleyan,”
but many who taught the Palmer way failed to achieve her balance at essential
points. Her “theological syllogism” as Dieter calls it, led to a pattern of teaching
into which the ensuing movement often fell, pressing upon seekers a simplistic
stereotyped formula that was in danger of precluding an authentic spiritual
experience.[iii]56
Mrs Palmer
intended to be a biblical Christian and therefore her use of altar theology was
meant to be Christocentric not anthropocentric. Her emphasis on the atonement and its
application to the believer is one which points to the merits and glory of
Christ. Every blessing received by the
believer is given as a result of God’s grace in Christ Jesus. Mrs Palmer’s use
of testimony could be construed to be a man centred approach, nothing could be
farther from the truth. Phoebe Palmer
uses testimony to lead to Christ, she says,
I will let every high state of grace in name, alone, and seek
only to be fully conformed to the will
of God as recorded in His written word.
My chief endeavours shall be centred in the aim to be an humble Bible
Christian. By the grace of God, all my energies shall be directed at this one
point. With this single aim, I will
journey onward even though my faith may be tried to the uttermost by those
manifestations being withheld, which have been previously been regarded as
essential for the establishment of faith.[iv]
Phoebe
Palmer realised her utter dependence upon God and his grace, this led her to a
deeper consecration; she surrendered her whole being to God for his
service. She saw this consecration as a
response to the richness of God’s grace.
We can see this in an important section of The Way of Holiness, when she
says,
With poverty of spirit her heart was constantly giving
utterance to its emotions with the poet-
“Thou all our works in me has wrought,
Our good is all
divine,
The praise of every virtuous thought
And righteous act is thine.”
And when (as she still continued in a waiting attitude before
the Lord) the Spirit appealed to her understanding thus “Through what power
have you been enabled thus to present yourself a living sacrifice to God?” Her
heart replied, “through the power of God, I could no more have brought myself,
but through faith in God, believing it to be his requirement, than I could have
created a world!” Immediately the Spirit
suggested, “If God has enabled you to bring it, will he not, now that you bring
it and lay it on the altar, accept it at your hands? She now, indeed, began to feel that all
things were ready! And, in thrilling
anticipation, began to say, “Thou wilt receive me! Yes, thou wilt receive
me! And still she felt something was
wanting. “But when and how shall I know that thou dost receive me?” Said the
importunate language of her heart. The Spirit presented the declaration of the
written word in reply, “Now is the accepted time.”[v]
She realised
that faith must be placed in the written word of God and not in feelings, ”Yet,
faith and feeling are two distinct objects, though so nearly allied”.[vi]59 Because of this she realised that she had
been seeking feelings rather than exercising faith in God and his Word. Her error at this point was to lead her to
emphasise naked faith in the Word of God.
One other point arising from the above quotation is that she ascribes
the altar terminology to the Holy Spirit.
In section 6
of, The Way of Holiness,
Mrs Palmer shows that her view of faith is now centred upon the word of
God, therefore, God must keep his promises.
This section is interesting because while there is a strong emphasis on
faith in the promises, there is also testimony given to the working of the Holy
Spirit at the same time. Here we
clearly see that Word and Spirit are not divorced in her thinking. It is interesting that in a chapter which
emphasises the act of faith, that we also find Phoebe Palmer’s testimony to the
inner witness of the Spirit. This inner
witness leads quite naturally to a greater awareness of the centrality of
Christ; she said,
Her perceptions of the absolute need of the atonement were
never so vivid as while journeying onward in this way. She felt she could not take one progressive
step, or for one moment present an acceptable sacrifice, but through the merits
of her Savior.[vii]
Mrs Palmer’s
altar theology has been referred to above but for a proper understanding of her
thinking, it is now necessary to briefly examine her explanation of this point. The whole concept of altar theology is
linked to and grows out of Mrs Palmer’s emphasis on faith in the written word
of God. In the Old Testament
dispensation the altar sanctified all that was placed on it; this is seen by
Mrs Palmer to be a shadow of the good things to come in Jesus Christ. In the New dispensation, Christ himself is
the altar and therefore when a believer places himself on the altar of Christ
that person is cleansed from all sin.
The act of consecration is the means to entire sanctification and was
later to become identified in Mrs Palmer’s thinking with the baptism of the
Holy Spirit. In section 9 of, The Way of Holiness, Mrs Palmer expounds at length her views on this
vital subject. Some examples of her
argument are given below.
The altar, thus provided by the cojoint testimony of the
Father, Son and Holy Spirit, is Christ.
His sacrificial death and sufferings are the sinners plea, the immutable
promises of the Lord Jehovah the ground of claim. If true to the Spirit’s operations on the
heart, men, as workers together with God, confess their sins, the faithfulness
and justice of God stand pledged not only to forgive but also to cleanse from
all unrighteousness.[viii]
And though she apprehend that nothing but the blood of Jesus
could sanctify and cleanse from sin, yet she was scripturally assured that it
was needful for the recipient of this grace, as a worker together with God, to
place himself believingly upon “the altar that sanctifieth the gift,” ere he
could prove the efficacy of the all-cleansing blood. Gracious intentions, and strong desires, she
was convinced, are not sufficient to bring about these important results; corresponding action is also necessary; the offering must be brought and believingly
laid upon the altar, ere the acceptance of it can be realised. In this crucifixion of nature, the Spirit
helpeth our infirmities, and worketh mightily to will-but man must act.[ix]
Mrs. Palmer
here strongly affirms a synergistic view of salvation and sanctification. Because of this she stressed the need to lay
all on the altar. This in turn led her
to stress that once one has placed oneself on the altar that person is
sanctified, hence the accusation of syllogistic holiness. This is to take her teaching out of context
because she is always emphasising the experiential nature of her faith and
indeed the Spirit’s working within.[x]63 Mrs Palmer taught that consecration was
something that must be maintained; it
was not a once and for all act but rather a constant keeping of oneself on the
altar by the power of the Holy Spirit.[xi]
Turning now
to Mrs. Palmer’s teaching on the baptism of the Spirit, it has been noted that
Mrs Palmer was one of the last to adopt this terminology. In her, Notes by the Way, there is an
interesting reference to baptism in the Spirit,
Mrs Palmer has been recounting the story of a man seeking to enter the
way of holiness when she says,
For about four hours he was no more under his own control, or
that of his friends around him, than the apostles were when first baptized with
the Holy Ghost. Many others were
baptized as suddenly at the same time.
He still continues a flaming witness of saving grace.[xii]
It is quite
clear from the context that Mrs Palmer identifies this experience with entire
sanctification. Mrs Palmer in her book, Full Salvation,[xiii]
We have known very marked cases other than the one we are
just now about to present, where the conversion of dear ones, though long
prayed for, was delayed till after the pleader had received that power from on
high which the full baptism of the Spirit brings[xiv]..
The context
of this passage clearly shows that Mrs Palmer identified the baptism of the
Spirit with entire sanctification; the
power that comes from this full baptism is one that comes from the cleansed
soul. She does not conceive the baptism
with the Spirit to be primarily about power for service but rather the
cleansing of the soul so that the person can live for the glory of God. In her book, The Promise of the Father[xv],,,
Phoebe Palmer continues to identify the baptism of the Spirit with entire
sanctification. She expresses this very
clearly in the following words,
A recognition of the full baptism of the Holy Ghost as a
grace to be experienced and enjoyed in the present life, was the distinguishing
doctrine of Methodism. And who can doubt
but it was this speciality that again brought out a host of Spirit-baptised
labourers, as in the apostolic days? And
the satisfaction with which this apostolic man [Wesley] recognised and
encouraged the use of the endowment of power is everywhere observable
throughout his writing.[xvi]
Mrs Palmer
as she refers to Wesley in the above passage, shows that she identifies his
teaching on entire sanctification with her teaching on the baptism with the
Holy Spirit.
Mrs Palmer
throughout her ministry was consciously Wesleyan in her theology. Her main emphasis was upon purity of heart
and it is the purified heart that is empowered to do God’s will.
Daniel
Steele was very obviously a man of scholarship, warm hearted discipleship and
worship of God. He maintained a pastoral heart and used his
learning for the benefit of the ordinary believer.
His writings
include; Love Enthroned,[xvii]70
The Gospel of the Comforter,[xviii]71 Milestone Papers,[xix] and,
The Gospel of the Comforter, for it is in these two volumes
that Daniel Steele presents his views in a systematic manner. Although, Love Enthroned,
was published in 1875 and, The Gospel
of the Comforter, in
1897, there is a continuity of thinking.
These volumes are clear statements of Wesleyan Theology and as such
represent the growing Holiness Movement.
With his distinct teaching he resisted equating the baptism of the
Spirit with power for service; he was
convinced that entire sanctification and the baptism of the Spirit are to be
equated. This reminds us that although
there was a growing emphasis on the baptism of the Holy Spirit being an
enduement with power from on high, we cannot claim this is the only emphasis. Two streams of thought were developing which
were to result in the emergence of the Pentecostal and Holiness Movements as we
know them today. It is therefore vital
that we evaluate this restatement of the Wesleyan position.
Love Enthroned:
Love Enthroned, by its title, leads one to expect a
restatement of the Wesleyan position.
Steele also brings his
scholarship to bear in a creative manner in this debate and therefore
makes a significant contribution of his own.
Steele was influenced at many points by Fletcher. This is apparent in his approach to both
the baptism of the Holy Spirit and the concept of three dispensations. Also Steele brings his knowledge of the
Greek text of the New Testament to bear upon the discussion. The emphasis on purity comes through
clearly when Daniel Steele says,
The age of miracles is not past. Jesus changed unresisting water into wine,
but the Holy Ghost transfigures the sinful soul bristling with antagonisms,
transforming depravity to purity by the mighty alchemy of Love. The power to
effect such revolutions in character constitutes the standing miracle of
Christianity.[xxi]
Steele goes
on to argue that entire sanctification must take place in this life if we are
to avoid any concept of purgatory; he
believes that the classic position held by Protestants turns death into a
purgatorial process thus transforming an enemy into a friend. Steele also believes that entire
sanctification is possible now because of the clear promises, commands and
statements of Scripture. He says,
The promises of sanctifying grace are available to believers
now, or they are worthless. For true faith can be
exercised for spiritual grace for ourselves only as it rests on the promise
which includes the present moment.“.“. “Knowing this, that the body
of sin might be destroyed, that henceforth we should not serve sin.” This promise of the destruction of sin begins
now, and is followed by a glorious
henceforth of emancipation this side of death.[xxii]
Although
Steele spoke of entire sanctification in glowing terms, he was also aware of
the results of the fall. Steele
recognised that the sanctified believer is still involved in spiritual warfare,
wandering thoughts caused by health and tiredness were still problems to
contend with. The whole of chapter six
shows that Steele had wrestled with the problems which are posed by those who
are opposed to entire sanctification.
He also had obviously thought through issues that would have perplexed
those who claimed to be entirely sanctified.
The purpose
of his seventh chapter is to demonstrate that entire sanctification and the
baptism with the Spirit are identical.
Steele commences his argument with reference to Acts15:9; he identifies the purifying of the believers
hearts with the second work of grace because he believed that Cornelius and his
household were already justified and thus their need was for the fullness of
salvation found in entire sanctification.
Steele says,
The conclusion is inevitable, that the baptism of the Holy
Ghost includes the extinction of sin in the believer’s soul as its negative and
minor part, and the fullness of love shed abroad in the heart as its positive
and greater part, in other words, it includes entire sanctification and
Christian perfection.[xxiii]
Steele
believed like, Fletcher whom he quotes, that a knowledge of the three
dispensations of Father, Son and Holy Spirit are essential for the preacher who
would lead his people to perfection.
He held that the present dispensation is that of the Holy spirit, the
provisions of this dispensation are that of cleansing from sin and the
reception of God’s blessing so that the believer may live a holy life. Steele believed that with the witness of
the Spirit in the believer's life it was possible to live a triumphant life.
Steele does not see a conflict between purity and power but rather he sees love
as power, love overcomes sin. Steele
does not turn all this into a neat formula but rather he recognises the diverse
ways God treats the individual believer.
He warns against setting up well known Christians as the standard to
which believers should conform. Steele
showed pastoral wisdom when he said,
While, therefore, everyone should covet the best gift, he
should not rest satisfied till he has received the grace of the Holy Ghost in
the plenitude of his purifying and inspiring efficacy. Then he should thankfully employ the gift
bestowed, and not in vain repining covet the more showy gift of his
fellow-laborer in the Lord’s vineyard.[xxiv]
Throughout,
Love Enthroned, Steele shows the greatness of God’s salvation but he teaches
that these blessings can only be received by faith. It is therefore important that the believer
should be instructed in the fullness of God’s grace. Only when the believer realises that the blessings are available to
him, will he respond in faith and receive all that God intends for him. Steele in his teaching is consistently
Arminian; this can be seen in his
synergistic presentation of the gospel.
He gives primacy to God’s grace at the same time as he teaches mans
responsibility to respond to that grace.
The Gospel of the Comforter: this book is a
continuation of Daniel Steele’s theological presentation of the work of the
Holy Spirit in the believer’s life.
Even though, The Gospel
of the Comforter was
written twenty four years after Love
Enthroned, there is a great deal of overlap,
as well as some complimentary teaching.
In
this sectionsectionsectiion
the discussion will be confined to looking at aspects of the teaching that are
clarified in, The Gospel
of the Comforter.
The first
point that will be looked at is, in
which ways Christ is the sanctifier and in which ways the Holy Spirit is the
sanctifier. Steele says,
When Christ is spoken of as our sanctification, it is meant,
not that he enters into the hearts of believers and cleanses them, but that he
provides the purifying medium, His own shed blood, and the sanctifying agent,
The Holy Spirit. The Son’s work is external, the Spirit’s
internal, or in philosophic terms, the work of one is objective, that of the
other is subjective; the one sanctifies provisionally and the other effectualy.[xxv]
This passage
is important to any understanding of the sanctifying work of the Holy Spirit.
By stressing the objective work of Christ and the subjective work of the
Spirit, Steele is able to demonstrate the unity of purpose between Son and
Spirit without compromising or confusing their roles in the economy of
salvation. Christ’s unique work of
redemption is upheld in all its glory while at the same time upholding the
dynamic nature of the Holy Spirit’s work in the application of that work to the
believer. Steele is keen to maintain
that entire sanctification is a crisis experience through which the believer
can receive the blessing of inner purity[xxvi]..
Steele discusses
the whole issue of the connection between purity and power in chapter
seventeen, which is entitled, “Christ’s two receptions and two bestowal's of
the Spirit”. In this chapter he states
that the believer needs to be cleansed before he is empowered. Steele says,
A sinners first need is newness of life imparted by the Holy
Spirit, the Lord of life, before he can walk in the footsteps of Christ. In the plan of salvation there is a divine
order which must be followed to attain the best results. In this order purity normally precedes
power. This proposition implies that
purity is not power. Jesus was perfectly
pure and sinless during the thirty years preceding his baptism, but there was
no miracle, no astonishing wisdom revealed to the people of Nazareth. He was known only as a blameless young man
and a good carpenter. But when filled
with the Spirit, “Many hearing him were astonished, saying, whence hath this
man these things? And what mean such
mighty works wrought by his hands?”
If even Jesus needed “the power of the Spirit,” and did not
enter his work till he received it, surely every Christian needs the same power
to do public or private work to which he is called. But let him follow the divine order for its
attainment, life before service and purity before power.[xxvii]
Steele also
discusses the relationship between purity and power in chapter thirty one, “The
Fullness of the Spirit”. In this
chapter, he is keen to maintain the priority of purity over power. He acknowledges that some have sought the
baptism of the Spirit as a full endument for service, however, he maintains
that in such cases, when one examines the testimonies given, there is clear
evidence given to show that purity has priority over power. Steele states it this way,
It is quite evident that purity is a prerequisite to this
indwelling fulness of the Spirit. This
is the divine order, first cleansed, then filled. All filling presupposes emptying. It is true that the baptism of the Spirit
has been sought and received as a full endowment for service. But a careful examination of such
experiences reveals the fact of the Spirit’s revelation of an inward bias to
moral evil, and of the seekers full consent to its extermination by the
purifying fire of the Spirit before he his abode within. This consent is part of his irreversible and
all-embracing self-surrender to Christ, the great Physician, whose healing
power is prepatory to the full endowment with the Holy Spirit.[xxviii]
The above
quotation shows that although Steele would not deny the testimonies of others,
he was not willing to accept that the baptism of the Spirit was anything less
than an experience of divine cleansing.
Steele, as
has been demonstrated above was thoroughly Wesleyan in his theology. He lifted up the banner of “scriptural
holiness” and expected believers to have their lives transformed by the
cleansing and empowering baptism of the Spirit.
Daniel Steele
in his work laid the foundation for a Holiness Theology which others would
build upon and it is a pity that this work is unknown outside of Holiness
circles. In the course of his life he
made a great contribution to the debate about the baptism of the Holy Spirit
but he also contributed other helpful insights into the work of the Holy Spirit
that are outside the remit of this paper.
[i] This
statement is found on the back cover of The Way of Holiness. (Salem, Ohio, Schmul Publishing 1988)
[ii] Timothy
Smith The Promise of the Spirit. 25.
[iii] Paul M
Bassett and William M Greathouse Exploring Christian Holiness volume 2 The
Historical Development. (Kansas
City. Beacon Hill Press. 1985),. 301
[iv] Phoebe
Palmer The Way of Holiness. (Salem,
Ohio. Schmul Publishing 1988) 16.
[v] The Way
of Holiness. 27.
[vi] The Way
of Holiness. 28.
[x] 63 For a
slightly different approach to this subject see, Ivan Howard, ‘Wesley versus
Phoebe Palmer: an extended
controversy’. Wesleyan Theological
Journal 6. Howard believes that Palmer’s view is more scriptural than Wesley’s.
[xi] See The Way of Holiness 87.
[xiii] Phoebe
Palmer Full Salvation (Salem,Ohio, Scmul
Publishers. N.d)
[xiv] Phoebe
Palmer Full Salvation 35
[xv] Phoebe
Palmer The Promise of the Father. (Salem, Ohio, Schmul Publishing. n.d.)
[xvi] Phoebe
Palmer The Promise of the Father. 55
[xix] Daniel
Steele The Milestone Papers. (Salem,
Ohio. Schmul Publishers 1984)
[xx] Daniel
Steele Defense of Christian Perfection.
(Salem, Ohio. Schmul Publishing
1984)
[xxiii] Love
Enthroned. 66
[xxiv] Love
Enthroned. 214
[xxv] The
Gospel of the Comforter 105
[xxvii] The
Gospel of the Comforter 139
No comments:
Post a Comment